News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Re: Moxie on Web3 by Andrew_nenakhov on Sunday January 09, 2022 @06:51AM (#29862464)
Third party getting the package is not a guarantee that you get the same package.
Re:Re: Moxie on Web3 by mjg59 on Sunday January 09, 2022 @06:54AM (#29862486)
If you've got to the point where Google is specifically pushing you a modified app, Google could just push a backdoored keyboard update that exfiltrated all your keyboard inputs instead. Why bother targeting a single app when you can get everything?
Re:Re: Moxie on Web3 by mike_hearn on Sunday January 09, 2022 @07:46AM (#29862765)
I think Android is designed such that even the Play Store cannot replace an installed app with a differently signed one. Or at least it used to be. And, "Android" is controlled by whoever made your phone, not directly by Google unless it's a Pixel device.

That said, it's a thin line. If Google had changed things at some point so that the Play Store could override the signing continuity requirement I wouldn't be remotely surprised.

Re:Re: Moxie on Web3 by JimDabell on Sunday January 09, 2022 @09:14AM (#29863376)
> I think Android is designed such that even the Play Store cannot replace an installed app with a differently signed one.

They can’t, however Google have recently changed the requirements for submitting an application to the Play Store. You now need to hand over your application signing key. Instead of signing the application to prove authenticity to Android devices then giving it to Google to host, you now sign the application to provide authenticity to Google, and then Google re-signs it with the key you gave them to prove authenticity to Android devices.

So if Google want to provide an alternative binary to a specific person, they can now do that.