Suburban areas with yards and neighborhood playgrounds not owned by the city are were kids actually could and did socialize during the pandemic.
> #2 kept their infection waves in check with early quick nuanced NPI instead of waiting until only the big hammer could help
No place succeeded at this, other than small island nations. This is a fake narrative.
#2 wasn't about suppressing the virus to zero (true, no place succeeded at, not even China), it as about avoiding long stretches of strong countermeasures by applying lighter countermeasures earlier. They still required some escalation for maybe a few weeks but that's far from what people had who had to dig themselves out from underneath a massive wave they ran into at full speed.
The places that locked down earlier stayed locked down, and the places that locked down later re-opened earlier. No state stayed locked down to "dig themselves out of a hole"; that's not how any of the waves played out.
The reason kids were stuck online all day over the past two years is not urban planning; it is because kids were not allowed to go to school or socialize.
You can make claims against the base rate this way, but not against the increase over the past two years.
(also, I have no reason to think that urban kids are in a better mental state than suburban ones this pandemic, and have anecdotal reasons to think the opposite).