News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada). Parent comment

Re:Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemplo... by dang on Saturday January 08, 2022 @10:36PM (#29859746)
Perhaps this will be clearer: (1) don't post snarky, low-information comments to HN; (2) do say something thoughtful and substantive.

Having something substantive in your head does not justify posting a snarky low-information comment. You need to make the substantive comment explicitly, and without the snark.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemplo... by ukj on Sunday January 09, 2022 @01:42AM (#29860886)
Perhaps this will be clearer: (1) Don't interpret my post as snarky (2) don't judge my comment as thoughtless and non-substantive when a thoughtful and substantive interpretation to my laconic comment exists (as you have become aware).

I heard you have a rule about that. Maybe you could lead by example.

  >Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
[ Parent | on HN ]