News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Approved Cameras by vanilla_nut on Saturday January 08, 2022 @07:23PM (#29858300)
The McDonald's of TV show production. With very, very few exceptions (Midnight Mass, maybe?) I at least know what I'm getting into: designed-by-committee, very very "safe", out of place (most likely contracted) references to other Netflix shows to try to cross-pollinate viewers... not exactly a recipe for success.

Similar to how Amazon Originals now seem synonymous with "we cut the writer's outline from 12 episodes to 6, enjoy the rushed character and plot development!"

Re:Approved Cameras by Lammy on Saturday January 08, 2022 @07:47PM (#29858492)
> designed-by-committee, very very "safe"

This is why I was so surprised by some of the background references Inside Job was able to drop in its first season. (Do they still call them seasons when they release all at once? Either way it's really good)

Re:Approved Cameras by bambax on Sunday January 09, 2022 @06:23AM (#29862321)
Agreed, except your last example. Most shows are much too long now, and extend way past after they have exhausted what little they had to say.
Re:Approved Cameras by SV_BubbleTime on Saturday January 08, 2022 @09:18PM (#29859202)
Yea, I can agree to Midnight Mass. Best quality was the plot of “X discovered by Y who thought it was Z”. But now that I think about it, the cinematography was pretty good. I know some people were put off by the long monologues, so it wasn’t without some odd choices.
Re:Approved Cameras by malermeister on Saturday January 08, 2022 @08:11PM (#29858692)
I thought Dark was excellent and not at all like you described.
Re:Approved Cameras by vkou on Saturday January 08, 2022 @08:50PM (#29858974)
DAЯK was excellent, but as the saying goes, it's the exception that proves the rule.