Re:James Webb is fully deployed
by Server6 on Saturday January 08, 2022 @03:34PM
(#29855890)
Why would we need two? I would think the next one 20+ years from now would hopefully be exponentially better.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
So that more researchers have access. Afaik access is shared and researchers have to make a proposal and get it approved before use, which to me suggests some kind of queue
Queueing researchers should be fine given the universe will be around for a while.
Next time you have to wait for your code to compile we'll say "should be fine, computers will be around for a while".
In 10 years we can send a bigger, simpler, cheaper, one-piece, non-foldable telescope in Starship for a fraction of the cost. The biggest saving wouldn't even be the launch costs - it would be the simple design allowed by relaxing the volume and mass constraints.
Re:James Webb is fully deployed
by wolverine876 on Saturday January 08, 2022 @04:28PM
(#29856483)
If only most of the cost was folding it (and if only Elon Musk's solutions somehow changed all the problems to fit them).
Re:James Webb is fully deployed
by BurningFrog on Saturday January 08, 2022 @04:06PM
(#29856260)
To get twice the science done, of course.