Re:DuckDuckGo Traffic
by ty___ler on Saturday January 08, 2022 @11:56AM
(#29853493)
Something happened the past few years where DDG image search feels like a functionally better product than google image search. I think it's a combination of a simpler frontend, and maybe a simpler "keyword-based" search algorithm (vs google which feels more ML-leaning). Note: I can't prove this claim at all – just a general feeling I have as someone who uses image search a lot.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Also you can mostly still click straight though to the image file itself, a feature which I believe Google removed at the request of site owners.
I think it was a lawsuit settlement from Getty Images.
Re:DuckDuckGo Traffic
by buscoquadnary on Saturday January 08, 2022 @03:36PM
(#29855916)
I've noticed whenever I use Google image search it seems like 90% of the results are Pinterest which I have 0 desire to visit whereas I hardly ever see Pinterest on ddg.
Re:DuckDuckGo Traffic
by dredmorbius on Saturday January 08, 2022 @10:00PM
(#29859524)
Google hasd to change image search due to a lawsuit by Getty Images preventing direct linking to the image itself.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/02/internet-rages-after...
Although DDG doesn't really compete in this niche yet, Google's reverse image search has gotten especially awful recently. Yandex does surprisingly well at it.
Re:DuckDuckGo Traffic
by benrapscallion on Sunday January 09, 2022 @03:58AM
(#29861612)
And the top row(s) in Google images are all for-sale product images masquerading as result.
Re:DuckDuckGo Traffic
by bamboozled on Saturday January 08, 2022 @12:00PM
(#29853541)
I always reach for it too for some reason