You did nothing wrong. No need to apologize.

Using a site generation framework that requires JS to render static text is doing something wrong.

It is a student making an easy blog. Chill out.

Exactly right

This is what I meant by "dangerous".

Static sites can do more than render text. Even collapsing comments on HN doesn't work with JavaScript disabled.

Rendering the primary text content and being able to collapse comments are not on the same level of functionality.

(Though for this particular website, I can see the text just fine with JS disabled in firefox, so I'm not sure why it doesn't work for CaliforniaKarl.)

> Even collapsing comments on HN doesn't work with JavaScript disabled.

But everything else pretty much does. HN is nice in that one can read it (and comment) without JS.

https://www.gatsbyjs.com/docs/reference/rendering-options/se... says they support HTML, though some of their own docs like https://www.gatsbyjs.com/pricing/ and https://www.gatsbyjs.com/dashboard/signup are broken.

you get to vote with your eyes and attention; if you truly want to advance your position come up with a better approach to convincing the rest of us.

If your comment was a drive-by sniping that made you feel good and has by now left your attention, mission accomplished.

I read your post in QTweb, Javascript disabled, just fine, so it must be something else.

Site renders fine for me in Safari on MacOS with JS disabled.