Re:Lost languages discovered in the oldest continuously run ...
by kaesar14 on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:03PM
(#29798613)
I don't think anyone disagrees English writing sucks, but the inertia is massive, and the benefits not all that clear relative to the absolutely massive cost. Retraining every English speaker to write, changing all our keyboards, changing signage and physical written word... it's a near impossible task. And it's not clear to me what the benefit is when, yes, a billion people can more or less communicate in it just fine.
Re:Lost languages discovered in the oldest continuously run ...
by nitrogen on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:58PM
(#29797712)
Regarding writing systems for English, have you seen this one? We had to learn about it when growing up in Utah:
Re:Lost languages discovered in the oldest continuously run ...
by xedrac on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @12:19AM
(#29805432)
As a Utah native, I'm curious what decade you were taught this. I've never seen it before, but it looks pretty similar to one I created as a kid to pass secret messages back and forth with a friend.
I'm not sure if you've ever had to learn English as a non-native English speaker, but it's one of the hardest, most painful, longest things to get truly proficient at, equal to other very hard aspects in one's very hard profession.
There are hundreds of millions of smart people who can't communicate their ideas to us in even simple English sentences. Whereas English grammar, as long as you avoid idioms, is pretty accessible as far as natural languages go.
So to sum up: as a global language English is maybe okay, but its writing system makes it not at all okay.