Re:Lab Leak 2.0?
by mike00632 on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @10:54AM
(#29796122)
"it stands to reason"
We should note you're talking about covered up lab leaks where all of the participants are conspiring to keep it secret because of convoluted motivations. It doesn't "stand to reason" that this happens at all, let alone is the normal case that we should all assume.
Re:Lab Leak 2.0?
by ds206 on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @11:39AM
(#29796725)
No, we're not talking about cover ups. We're talking about studying the virus and it escaping by accident. Also, there is a history of lab leaks so it stands to reason...
Re:Lab Leak 2.0?
by mike00632 on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @07:40PM
(#29817501)
The title is "Lab Leak 2.0". The '1.0' is referring to the popular story about a covered up lab leak in China and the ensuing conspiracy to keep it all a secret.
We should note you're talking about covered up lab leaks where all of the participants are conspiring to keep it secret because of convoluted motivations. It doesn't "stand to reason" that this happens at all, let alone is the normal case that we should all assume.