Re:Copyright doesn't need 95 years to get the job done
by cogman10 on Monday January 03, 2022 @06:32PM
(#29788628)
Because we are talking about the ability to copy or mimic things when talking about IP/patent laws. We are not talking about physical goods, but instead ideas.
It's a crime to steal someone's bible even though the bible texts are (largely) in public domain.
It is not the same to compare a thing to a concept. I can copy someone's bitcoin hash all day long, but I don't own that hash simply be copying it into a text document. Same principle.
Anyone should be able to write and sell a story about Superman or Mickey.
Re:Copyright doesn't need 95 years to get the job done
by Matumio on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:17PM
(#29789079)
Oh no, you are now required to watch this damned cartoon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeTybKL1pM4 (A one minute ELI5 explanation about the difference between physical and intellectual property.)
Re:Copyright doesn't need 95 years to get the job done
by Dylan16807 on Monday January 03, 2022 @06:24PM
(#29788551)
If you build a house, other people can copy it after 20 years.
Suddenly it doesn't sound unreasonable at all.
> something someone else created and owns
The way someone should "own" an idea is exactly what's being disputed...
How is this different - why should I be entitled to get, for free, something someone else created and owns.