An Algorithm for Passing Programming Interviews (2020)

Re:An Algorithm for Passing Programming Interviews (2020) by o10449366 on Monday January 03, 2022 @06:44AM (#29779805)

I can't speak for them, but I would assume that jsiaajdsdaa still considered themselves qualified for their positions - even if they employed ethically questionable methods for passing the interviews. In the end isn't that all that matters given that's what these interviews are supposedly trying to measure?

What part of jsiaajdsdaa's process do you think is more efficient? To me it sounds less objective ("the goal is not so much to solve it") which seems like it would make the process less efficient when assessing candidates.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:An Algorithm for Passing Programming Interviews (2020) by bryanrasmussen on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:21AM (#29781006)

I think as a general rule the idea that you give someone something that they are unlikely to solve because they are not completely familiar with the problem space does measure some things well - specifically, how one performs with something new and unknown (a critical programming skill) and their ability to abstractly reason as opposed to having memorized some information.

Although for other things related to the job not that useful.

That said I was talking about your comment that it was somewhat unethical; they didn't so much think that they gamed the system but that the system was so inefficient at doing what it should do that someone had to fit themselves to the system to get in.

[ Parent | on HN ]