"(4) (FALSE) Wuhan is a place where SARS transmits from animals into humans frequently. That's why the Wuhan Institute of Virology was built there.
Actually, Wuhan is ~1000km away from SARS spillover zones. Its human population was even used as a negative (no SARS) control group."
1. Wuhan is not known for spillover.
2. Cave visits did happen but this has never been connected to the 3 "sick researchers" reported by US intel.
3. Sure, lab origin, zoonosis, engineering or not, all still on the table, just factually what OP wrote was inaccurate or misleading.
Also, I believe that the first recorded outbreak of SARS was in Guangdong while the origin of the virus was eventually found to be in Yunnan, 1000+km away.
The closest related natural viruses to SARS-CoV2 were not found in Wuhan. They were found in caves in Yunnan, and possibly Laos.
> The same caves three of that lab's researchers went into before becoming hospitalized with a flu-like illness in December of 2019
Again, Yunnan, not Wuhan. The researchers worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Noted, about "nearby", edited.
ETA: parent comment (to their credit!) edited the above to remove the world "nearby" either while I was replying or right after. Still leaving this comment up because it's worth pointing out just how far those caves are from Wuhan.