Russia 'likely' to invade Ukraine without 'enormous sanctions'

Re:Russia 'likely' to invade Ukraine without 'enormous sanct... by skinnymuch on Monday January 03, 2022 @12:56AM (#29777805)

Isn’t this going to cost a ton of money, too much, and you can only move in so many of your own citizens. Russia can’t move too many of their own since Ukraine doesn’t have a small population. Voters still vote. Not sure why even with puppets, a majority vote to join your country would happen.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Russia 'likely' to invade Ukraine without 'enormous sanct... by andy_jensen on Monday January 03, 2022 @04:59AM (#29779082)

It will also cost a lot to get hit by 'enormous sanctions' plus it wouldn't really be a cost as opposed to a long term investment. China is currently investing heavily in the African infrastructure and I doubt Chinas intentions are philanthropically motivated

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Russia 'likely' to invade Ukraine without 'enormous sanct... by skinnymuch on Monday January 03, 2022 @11:52PM (#29791489)

China’s total Africa investments are not that high compared to the scenario of the parent to infiltrate Ukraine that way. The issue of where the population of people to move to Ukraine doesnt work either.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Russia 'likely' to invade Ukraine without 'enormous sanct... by Grakel on Monday January 03, 2022 @01:11PM (#29784029)

A military invasion costs more, especially if it doesn't go well. Better to buy, bribe, and bully.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Russia 'likely' to invade Ukraine without 'enormous sanct... by skinnymuch on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @04:50AM (#29807081)

I responded to a comment saying to pack Ukraine with Russians from Russia. That’s an incredibly expensive endeavor in every way. Russia doesn’t have that many people. Ukraine isn’t a low population country.

[ Parent | on HN ]