That's fair. I understand that in the ideal world, it would be "can't." I guess my concern is that the wording kind of hand waves away any potential security issues, when people interested in this tech should absolutely be made aware of them.
Re:Notes on BPF and eBPF
by quickthrower2 on Sunday January 02, 2022 @06:26PM
(#29775275)
“is not authorized to” ?
"Isn't supposed to be able to" is a lot longer and distracting vs the oversimplification-for-sake-of-understanding of "can't". As far as it being proven wrong though - that's already happened, eg CVE-2021-29154
https://blog.kernelcare.com/vulnerability/specially-crafted-...