Re:United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
by brendoelfrendo on Friday December 31, 2021 @08:57PM
(#29754676)
Only when you're dependent on NAT for security. NAT isn't intended to be a security tool, and is pretty bad at mitigating against attacks that aren't just "log into this device directly." As others have said, a robust firewall and some good access controls and you'll be fine.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
by VectorLock on Friday December 31, 2021 @09:57PM
(#29755038)
"anything inside my home network from anywhere on the internet" doesn't sound much like robust access controls.
I wouldn't trust the horrible default passwords and lax security built into most devices for home use to be exposed directly to the Internet even with a firewall.
Re:United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
by brendoelfrendo on Saturday January 01, 2022 @12:01AM
(#29755683)
Robust access controls would be things like certificate auth, MFA is cool, fail2ban is good, maybe throw in some roles there; whatever floats your boat. So yeah, your security model should involve not using default passwords and not using devices that have unchangeable default passwords.
Again, people are depending on something that isn't really designed to provide security to provide security. Devices that have horrible default passwords aren't secure in any environment. We need to a) do better in picking what we run on our networks and b) hold manufacturers accountable for setting sane defaults.
Re:United States IPv6 adoption over 50%
by VectorLock on Sunday January 02, 2022 @10:23PM
(#29776979)
If your threat model involves baby sitting every device in your network and making sure they're robustly secure.
Some people just want their lightswitches to work.