Translation: He got a new thing, and it's pretty nice. In case anyone wants to know his basis for comparison, here it is.
This article is clearly not about CPU benchmarks(or best blue tooth mice or best Linux distro or any of a dozen other things.)
But I agree - These performance claims are starting to miss the point. The real magic of the M1 is the battery life and thermals. It’s not actually faster than my AMD desktop when it comes down to testing things like compile times, but I don’t care because the M1 lets me do it on battery in a portable manner.
I didn't even bother to try to read any of the content.
I do use it on my PC, but I'm on my Android right now. Do ad blockers work on Android?
I guess I haven't cared enough to look since I mostly just do light web usage on my phone: HN, reddit, and twitter are about it, and ads aren't too bad on those sites.
Either way, I don't think it is too much to ask for web sites not to have actual scams on them. I'm not talking about legit ads which are annoying enough, but rather things that try to mimic a pop-up window and tell me my device is hacked or has viruses.
I'm not going to fall for that of course, but some people are less aware and might.
I love those performance comparisons with 5-10 years old processors. Let's compare M1 with 80186 from 1982, then it will look even faster!
Here is comparison with the new mobile Intel processor that will be released next month:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/11905527?baseli...