Re:Scientists have created the darkness measure, D score, fo...
by anigbrowl on Thursday December 30, 2021 @01:50AM
(#29734335)
Those are good criticisms. My (2nd hand) understanding is that in institutional settings where there would be incentives to lie on a self-report the grading is done on a clinical instrument by a professional who educes the answers through conversation rather than stating them plainly. At least, that's how the Hare psychopathy checklist is done, and subjects who would score high on that are disproportionately likely to want to game such an instrument.
Re:Scientists have created the darkness measure, D score, fo...
by themodelplumber on Thursday December 30, 2021 @02:37AM
(#29734580)
Thanks, that's really interesting. The professional aspect is a little bit concerning TBH. From what I learned in instruction on psychometric instruments in the past I think I'd be inclined to request that some random sample of N professionals carry this out. Especially to the degree that some individual's institutional future hangs in the balance...
Re:Scientists have created the darkness measure, D score, fo...
by staticautomatic on Thursday December 30, 2021 @02:07AM
(#29734428)
Ideally, a psychometric test has a validity scale (e.g. the MMPI)
"I tend to forgive the wrongs I have suffered." Oh yeah. For _sure_, institutions who are in charge of assessing me, I would _definitely_ tend to forgive those wrongs...
Hopefully this would be one of many instruments used...
Plus with error around things like maybe not-so-necessary English issues for lower-level readers: "There is poor comfort in revenge." Phrasing?
Items requiring more analytical thinking to understand than other items: "If I opposed the election of an official, then I would be glad to see him or her fail even if their failure hurt my community."
Just to say--love the research, really curious about the application...