I see your concern that a district choosing not to stock a book is not news, but in this case it sounds like the book was available and used in the curriculum in many districts for the past 6 years, and then only banned this year after the video by Kara Bell was publicized.
Quick note, I'm not 100% against killing fascists. There's a time and a place for anything (eg: d-day).
Careful what you say about killing fascists...using violence to squash an ideology you don't agree with is basically fascism. People calling themselves anti-fascist but attacking people who are exercising their right to protest something is extremely stupid and hypocritical.
Answer this and that will answer your question.
I let my kids look at Nat Geo Kids. I don't have them looking at hustler. This is parenting 101 stuff. Every study shows that letting kids be kids is a good thing for their development.
Yes, some kids (often without good parental involvement) get exposed to "adult" topics much earlier. This is correlated with plenty of miserable and sad outcomes.
Let me ask you this. Why should you, who is not a parent of the kids in this school, have a right to force violent imagery on those kids? Or force the procurement and availability of this material? Or of any material?
Answer that question - and you will answer your own question.
Some reviews here:
http://commonsensemedia.org/book-reviews/out-of-darkness/use...
Example:
This novel crosses some legal boundaries with the adult/child abuse and rape scenes. It is VERY detail, vivid, and graphic. It includes descriptive scenes of the main character being sexually abuse by her father. Years later, her pastor encourages her to marry her stepfather as a child.
This book continues to get worse as it include graphic images of children violently harmed. Eventually, a bomb goes off at school and her little sister is killed- graphic descriptions of her body parts are all over.
This novel is a canvas, showcasing child abuse. There isn't any healthy themes or solutions.
The poster demands your child be exposed to this - no regard to age or your own parental views.
It literally never ever means the student can't possess it.
Or is that the school libraries won't stock the book?
There is a somewhat big difference between a school library not stocking a book and a school district banning it for all students.
Iran school district bans bible might be very different from this texas "ban".
Why is it so important that children have access to this book? Do (local) parents working with a (local) school district not have some right to input on these things?