I mean, if we are to accept the absurd take that civil liberties were under attack because of the response to a global pandemic, something that didn't happened, then it's equally possible that the people against lockdowns and other measures are just whining, because they are slightly inconvenienced by rules that may prevent their fellow humans' deaths.

This is the sort of hyperbole that interferes with meaningful discussion.

There are lots of reasonable restrictions that a society may impose in the face of crisis, and the nature of those is certainly worth exploring.

Claiming that a virus that poses very little risk the the vast majority of the population warrants home arrest, involuntary medical procedures, and a massive expansion of state power is one of these, is a bit of a stretch.

The fact that you believe I'm "killing my neighbor" by going to a restaurant is disappointing if true, and ugly if hyperbolic.