Re:Maybe we could tone down the JavaScript (2016)
by ninkendo on Monday December 27, 2021 @03:08PM
(#29706234)
Customizable look and feel means lack of consistency, and confusion as to why things look different without good reason.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Maybe we could tone down the JavaScript (2016)
by levmiseri on Monday December 27, 2021 @05:13PM
(#29707446)
Consistency is overrated. Context is what matters. And context often requires customized controls.
We will never live in a world where an abstract concept like a checkbox can have an 'assigned' specific visual affordance that doesn't allow for adjustments. Such thinking is stuck in the past and won't allow for new/better UI paradigms.
Re:Maybe we could tone down the JavaScript (2016)
by zbentley on Monday December 27, 2021 @10:36PM
(#29710045)
Consistency is a shortcut to usability; context is the long way 'round. Don't take the long way unless you're prepared to do so with care.
Re:Maybe we could tone down the JavaScript (2016)
by Shacklz on Monday December 27, 2021 @04:48PM
(#29707199)
This purist talk about how everyone should stick to some system standard or whatever really needs to die. It's not working. Nobody is doing it.
Everyone, literally everyone is running their own thing. Name me big company that doesn't roll their own design system.
Preaching purism really doesn't help anyone, let's just accept reality as it is, and stop chasing some utopian dreams that just won't ever materialize (and if only because it would make a lot of jobs and professions useless, overnight, and there's too much inertia for that to happen).