News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Risk of myocarditis following sequential COVID-19 vaccina... by cblconfederate on Sunday December 26, 2021 @11:05PM (#29699051)
I wish these papers were printed in journals that publish the reviewer comments. In fact i think it should be a requirement for all journals. Unfortunately all online commentary ends up becoming a pissing contest where everyone is trying to outwit each other instead of attacking the paper itself from all angles.
Re:Risk of myocarditis following sequential COVID-19 vaccina... by mhh__ on Sunday December 26, 2021 @11:24PM (#29699183)
Oh god yes. Considering the leech-like synecdoche journals are for all that stinks in academia at the moment, I really wish they'd try and make a better place for public discussion between experts than Twitter spats.

There are probably far too many papers that academics have discovered flaws in but don't have time to do anything about

Re:Risk of myocarditis following sequential COVID-19 vaccina... by sysOpOpPERAND on Monday December 27, 2021 @12:42AM (#29699726)
i am agreeing with you and parent comment, there is definitely room for growth in how these journals are presented. i think having access to the full discussion would be an amazing step forward for the science community as well as those who are interested in grasping a deeper understanding of how and why the discussion decided to go with their findings
Re:Risk of myocarditis following sequential COVID-19 vaccina... by cblconfederate on Monday December 27, 2021 @03:58AM (#29700784)
some journals like Elife or Frontiers do publish the commentary. I think for COVID related papers it should be a requirement in all journals