In a high-renewables regime, there's the "duck curve" problem where renewable energy, especially solar power, is most abundant during the midday, whilst demand peaks in the early evening as lighting, heating or cooling loads (depending on season), and you guessed it, cooking loads come on-line.
If you arrive home at 17:30 and plan on eating within the half hour, you're using the most expensive electricity of the day.
That said, total cooking energy use isn't tremendously high (2--3 kW), and most heating tasks consume less than full output for well under an hour. You can operate a cooktop or oven at full heat for an hour for well under $1 unless rates are Texas-level high. That would be seriously atypical usage.
https://www.directenergy.com/learning-center/how-much-energy...
Taking advantage of lower midday rates would be possible with a crock-pot, slow-cooker, sous-vide, or similar methods, though that does require advanced planning and doesn't suit all cooking techniques.
Both loads are fairly modest in California compared to other parts of the US, though AC usage in the inland valleys may be high, and will likely be getting higher bye and bye.
Whole-house air filtration may also increasingly become A Thing.
Yes, the energy loads are fairly minimal. Though you'll have a blower, and either replaceable filters or electrostatic filters (themselves requiring an additional power draw).
Baking a loaf of bread would cost me $7 at current TOU peak. It's cheaper for me to buy one from the grocery store on energy costs alone, nevermind the material. That's craziness.
And even baseline rates in CA rise at 3-4x inflation. Maybe burning kerosene for lighting will become economically viable again.