News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AWS Support able to access any S3 object due to permissio... by judge2020 on Thursday December 23, 2021 @01:43PM (#29664986)
> If a provider puts themselves in a position that they’re entirely unable to access my data, or it being extremely difficult, that would actually increase my trust in them.

This is never possible if you're using KMS / server side encryption or no encryption at all. Your data on these services is always visible if they were to try to read it, whether that be forging KMS requests to decrypt data or passively snapshotting VM memory for inspection. Technically this might be solved via recent datacenter CPU security improvements but there will always be flaws and 0-days that people with money and a will can use to bypass these protections.

Use rclone with encryption for S3 and consider anything else potentially visible.

Re:AWS Support able to access any S3 object due to permissio... by stingraycharles on Thursday December 23, 2021 @03:56PM (#29666367)
Of course, that’s why I said “extremely difficult” — it’s never completely impossible. I was thinking about Apple, who made iCloud reasonably e2e encrypted: of course, they can still push malicious updates targeting specific devices, but that needs to be a deliberate action by the organization, not a single rogue employee.

It’s not entirely unlikely that AWS was hacked / socially engineered in order to get this privilege in there, perhaps because some specific s3 buckets were being targeted.

As an organization, you need to have a high enough level of protection that these things are just not possible.

So maybe this whole idea of managed IAM policies being installed in all customers’ accounts is just a fundamentally bad idea, and should just be given on a case by case basis.