Re:Tell HN: AWS appears to be down again
by Retric on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @10:09AM
(#29650308)
You still need to pay someone to manage AWS infrastructure. It’s possible to save money using AWS, but things often get more expensive.
Re:Tell HN: AWS appears to be down again
by nostrebored on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @10:26AM
(#29650519)
Of SMBs I’ve worked with, about 5% had a dedicated AWS engineer
Re:Tell HN: AWS appears to be down again
by Nextgrid on Thursday December 23, 2021 @01:52PM
(#29665091)
Maybe non-tech businesses which I’m not very familiar with. But most startups absulutely have a dedicated DevOps engineer.
Re:Tell HN: AWS appears to be down again
by Nextgrid on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @10:08AM
(#29650281)
> Human capital side would disagree with that I think
I hear this argument a lot, but every startup I've been involved with had a full-time DevOps engineer wrangling Terraform & YAML files - that same engineer can be assigned to manage the bare-metal infrastructure.
Re:Tell HN: AWS appears to be down again
by dragonwriter on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @10:21AM
(#29650448)
> I hear this argument a lot, but every startup I've been involved with had a full-time DevOps engineer wrangling Terraform & YAML files - that same engineer can be assigned to manage the bare-metal infrastructure.
Bare metal infrastructure requires a lot more management at any given scale. I mean, you can run stuff that lets you do part of the management the same as cloud resources, but you also have to then manage that software and manage the hardware.
If you're outsourcing that, you'd likely have to pay a boatload just for someone to be available for help, let alone the actual tasks themselves. Like you said, if you're on-prem and something goes down, you can do something. But you've gotta have the personnel to actually do something.
That said, I think you're spot-on as long as you have the skillset already.