Not that I support preying on these muppets at all, but it’s rather ironic given the complete inability to distinguish the properties of ionising vs non-ionising radiation is the basis of most anti-5G ideology.

See also:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29603178

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29597824

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29598821

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29592580

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29619788

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29607193

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29607193

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29619591

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29636216

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29599341

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29610916

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29615285

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29585069

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29624362

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29604414

Reminds me of Thought Emporium's video about negative ion bracelets: https://youtu.be/C7TwBUxxIC0

New sales pitch:

It stops 5G _and_ kills cancer cells.