Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by amcoastal on Monday December 20, 2021 @05:30PM
(#29631257)
Exactly! I'm working on some stuff now to exploit this very effect, the small time difference in the bands can be used to find velocities of moving objects.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by tech_timc on Monday December 20, 2021 @06:09PM
(#29631704)
The same effect can be used to estimate cloud heights, and to identify aircraft flying above clouds.
Parallax based Cloud Detection for Sentinel-2 Analysis Ready Data Generation https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332999809_Parallax_...
Aircraft Detection above Clouds by Sentinel-2 MSI Parallax https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/15/3016
Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by magicroot75 on Monday December 20, 2021 @11:37PM
(#29633939)
Is this at all analogous to how we used red/blue shift to determine the speed at which astronomical objects are moving towards/away from us?
Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by oivey on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @01:55AM
(#29634739)
No, that’s the Doppler effect. This is a time delay between when different colors were captured.
Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by magicroot75 on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @06:26AM
(#29636307)
Ah gotcha. Makes sense. Thanks!
Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by samhw on Monday December 20, 2021 @05:44PM
(#29631448)
This is incredibly cool. What's the application (if it's possible to obscure whatever details you don't want to divulge)?
Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by amcoastal on Monday December 20, 2021 @05:58PM
(#29631605)
Its coastal physics work, you can infer near shore conditions by watching wave propagation.
Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by geoduck14 on Monday December 20, 2021 @10:46PM
(#29633590)
So... like where submarines are based on water disturbances?
Re:Stealth bomber in flight on Google Maps
by amcoastal on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @07:50AM
(#29636862)
That's not what I'm doing but it seems possible you could watch refraction patterns and tell that there are submerged objects, but you'd need to know the water depth without that object there, as there'd be no great way to tell if the object is a submarine or a pile of sand. Also, most of these satellites pass over fairly rarely so wouldn't be super useful for tracking things that move. I'm mostly interested in finding the piles of sand :)