Article you linked says: Absolutely nothing to support this
You claim: "His DA office is only trying ~50% of crimes compared to other major cities"
Article you linked says: The charging rate was completely unchanged when Boudin became DA.
If you are going to make an outrageous claim that "they are under instructions directly from Chesa Boudin" you have to provide evidence that this is true, otherwise it will appear to be a lie.
2018 - 10,058 property crimes
2019 - 9,404 property crimes
Boudin Elected
2020 - 13,632 property crimes 44% increase
2021 - 6,180 property crimes (half year of stats only)
Boudin has initiated a catch and release for non-felony crimes which means the police arrest someone for breaking into a apartment and they are on the streets the next day due to no cash bail. Charging rates are extremely low(from 2018-2019) as the previous SF DA George Gascon initiated the same policies as Boudin and went to LA as DA and he(gascon) is also being recalled.
When pressed on this point, you are relying on deflection to other criticisms you have of Boudin. Eliminating cash bail is in no way, shape, or form a direct instruction to not arrest property criminals.
That is not the chain of command. They're completely separate bureaucracies.
If they want public intoxication collars, all of the sudden they will appear. Anytime someone tells you the DA is some bystander, laugh.
Info about Chesa Boudin - https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Chesa-Boudin-San-Fra...
recall - https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/exclusive-sf-district-...