Re:Animal protein intake is inversely associated with mortal...
by iammjm on Thursday December 16, 2021 @06:49PM
(#29585667)
'inversely associated' means people who ate more of it lived longer or the opposite? I'm hella confused
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Animal protein intake is inversely associated with mortal...
by tick_tock_tick on Thursday December 16, 2021 @06:51PM
(#29585687)
Double negatives are hard to read but yeah more meat less chance of death.
Re:Animal protein intake is inversely associated with mortal...
by edoceo on Thursday December 16, 2021 @07:35PM
(#29586096)
Isn't there like a 100% chance of death?
Re:Animal protein intake is inversely associated with mortal...
by robobenjie on Thursday December 16, 2021 @07:41PM
(#29586143)
I mean only 93% of humans have died so who knows for certain....
https://www.prb.org/articles/how-many-people-have-ever-lived...
Re:Animal protein intake is inversely associated with mortal...
by pvaldes on Friday December 17, 2021 @08:05PM
(#29600361)
> Isn't there like a 100% chance of death?
Not, just 99.99999%.
Clonal cell lines are basically immortal.
(And the chance of death at a given age is not 100% necessarily)
Re:Animal protein intake is inversely associated with mortal...
by x0rx0r on Thursday December 16, 2021 @06:57PM
(#29585732)
woohoooo more steak and burgers for me!
Re:Animal protein intake is inversely associated with mortal...
by generalizations on Thursday December 16, 2021 @06:57PM
(#29585731)
"inverse association" is a standard way of saying that when X goes up or down, Y does the opposite.
Re:Animal protein intake is inversely associated with mortal...
by lotsofpulp on Thursday December 16, 2021 @07:40PM
(#29586133)
I have never seen mortality used to mean lifespan.
I assume it is a clickbait title technique intentionally misusing words to pique interest.