What are you supposed to do when you recognize a shortcoming or a way society/technology has regressed, but the thing is out of your or anyone's control to actually fix? Not talk about it?
> What do we get from these endless articles about why some product or technology sucks?
Recognition of the problem, so that no one could just claim that everything is great, when there are good demonstrable historical reasons to rightfully claim otherwise. Sure, on one hand some of it might make you feel worse, but on the other, i think it's nice to document how things were in a time where many weren't around to experience all of it. Not everyone should grow up with only the knowledge of walled gardens, closed platforms and largely centralized and corporation driven Internet.
Very rarely (but still) you also get actionable steps to take, or the ability to build communities with like minded individuals, such as: https://512kb.club/
Or maybe just fun little projects, for example, by people like Luke Smith: https://based.cooking/ (there is information at the bottom of the site about it)
Make a new service. Make it username / password authenticated. Don't give out the usernames and passwords to everyone that comes in. Have some kind of gating function (BBS's were all about who you knew, somethingawful.com made you pay twenty bucks one time, some old systems were gated on something no more complex than single-administrator bandwidth).
You won't grow at a rate that any VC will care about, but that kind of capitalism-feeding growth isn't your goal if you're trying to cultivate a "web 1.0 experience:" web 1.0 didn't support most people's capitalist ventures.
What you may find (what I've found participating in these experiments) is that the resulting space is a whole lot quieter than the rest of the web. And if you're replicating the web 1.0 experience, that's the goal.
The site administrator will also spend a lot more time glad-handing individual users who have individual issues. That's fine; if you're going for a web 1.0 experience, authentication management isn't automated beyond a few simple config scripts.
And if that's what a person wants, nothing about the modern web stops them from doing it, except that very few people will care they're doing it because (unlike the web 1.0 days) there are alternatives that accept all comers with functionally infinite capacity now.
You know something is not quite right, and can moan about it, without having a solution to the problem.
Considering many people have drifted away from some of the big socials. Niche sites, and communities may and no doubt have sprung up elsewhere. Newsnet and PhpBB rooms of old have been replaced by other forums.
In the UK, the web was the preserve of the well-to-do for a long time. Ubiquitous smart phones have put the web in almost every man's pocket these days. And the initial lavish jump on and novelty will wear off. Everyone's a troll and photographer for 5 minutes, or some such.
My Mum has only just really discovered the web in the last year, via Youtube. She still doesn't really get the web, but gets that website (ish). It's still fresh for many.
It's probably just easier to poke at a thing.
Web rings still exist. My partner has a hobby, which is shared on a forum and via Youtube, and they are all very good at supporting and bigging up each other across those boundaries. It's a very vibrant community. And the technology is just backgrounded.
Seriously, they lead with "it was better when there were no search engines and you had to trawl through a directory". I'm old enough to remember that. It wasn't better. It sucked.
They even list phpBB style forums as a positive thing. I mean sure I guess they're better than StackOverflow and Discourse if you like clicking "next page" 84 times to find the solution to your problem.
Their spectacles are so rose-tinted I'm surprised they can see through them at all.
Insight into the thought processes of other people. That's enough for me.
I recently was discussing web3 on indiehackers. Way more constructive discussions.
Maybe the next article reaching the top is how the old HN was better ;).
edit: And looking at those articles, the conservative side is definitely in the majority. Like I say: just shouting at each other.
This one did actually point out a few ideas.
While these articles lament the state of technology today and wish it were better like back in the good old days, there are never solutions put forward. Only negativity.
Why do they gain so much traction on HN, one of the few remaining outposts of thought-provoking articles and discussion?
What do we get from these endless articles about why some product or technology sucks?