> Is it centrally located for commuting workers and testing sites or the personal preferences of the founders?
The house in question was probably the comma.ai office in West Portal, SF (right next to the West Portal Station). Draw your own conclusions regarding commutes, it’s a pretty central location.
> Is it scalable for a growing company?
Offices are rarely very scalable, you just move somewhere else once it no longer works.
The point of my original comment is not to say that doing so is objectively bad, but I had just left an abusive startup run by a young and inexperienced startup and I wanted something more stable. I ended up getting a job at a Toyota research branch in a boring office park and I played with a cute little robot. It was just what I needed at the time.
Wasn't snap for example running out of a few houses on the la beach? Maybe they weren't mansions, but I'm sure the rent was high.
This is common for startups in the seed stage. I don't personally recommend it but I wouldn't consider it to be a red flag for a pre-series-A startup.
> * Is there adequate parking or public transportation?
There is practically no public transportation in the bay area. No, there is never enough parking.
> * Is it legal? Does it conform to HOA and city requirements?
Nobody takes a shit about HOAs. Startups exist to drill square pegs into circular holes. Hell, I'd love to create a startup to help people get rid of HOAs.
* Are the founders or employees living in their office?
* Are they treating it like a work environment or a party house? Are the work, kitchen, and bathroom environments professionally maintained.
* Is there adequate parking or public transportation?
* Is it legal? Does it conform to HOA and city requirements?
* Is it centrally located for commuting workers and testing sites or the personal preferences of the founders?
* Is it scalable for a growing company?
Renting a mansion as an office throws a hundred red flags to anyone wanting a serious outcome from a startup.