The easiest form of media to create is unedited video.
The hardest is edited video
It’s funny that unedited, poorly rehearsed “presenting style” has in a way taken on a life of its own. Speaking to a director off-camera, quick jump cuts of multiple takes, drawing attention to flubbing of lines, are all sort of techniques used in YouTube videos to show “authenticity” to the viewer (ie, I’m just a regular person making these videos).
I was listening to a podcast recently and noticed they left in some banter before an interview started. The banter added nothing to the discussion since they weren’t even talking about the topic yet. Its sole purpose was to make the chat feel informal and, in my opinion, “more real”.
Meanwhile radio shows were taking out individual ums and errs, even in the analog era.
This. Although I have discovered why the jump cut is so popular! Actually, even inexpert jump-cutting does improve things though, so worth doing.
Extensive use of jump-cuts lets you edit single-camera monologues as if they were text. Much easier & cheaper than doing re-shoots, using multiple cameras, et c.
I can personally attest that this style was extremely off-putting to us oldsters (millennial here—yeah, we're getting old) until we'd had a few years to get used to it. It's not something you see in traditional video media unless a mistake happens, or you're watching some kind of weird art thing.
Re:How I spend less time on YouTube
by wingerlang on Thursday December 09, 2021 @09:47AM
(#29497878)
There are very badly written articles as well though.
Re:How I spend less time on YouTube
by xboxnolifes on Thursday December 09, 2021 @10:09AM
(#29498157)
Yeah, but I can also usually tell an article is bad in a 15 second skim. Videos aren't always so generous.
If and only if the steps are performed in the correct order without any fluffs. In one particularly bad example that I saw someone was showing how to use an updated feature in Photoshop. The sequence went something like
* the instructor showed the old way of doing things
* they then did 'undo' a few times to get back to the point where the new feature was different
* they started showing the new way
* they then realised they'd made a mistake earlier on - missing out a step in the new sequence
* they did undo a few times
* they did the step they'd omitted
* they then carried on from that point
I had to watch several times to work out the actual sequence of correct operations. To my mind they should have re-recorded from the beginning rather than show their disrespect for the viewers.