Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by webkike on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @12:12PM
(#29487396)
Now you have two ledgers, one of which isn’t distributed
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by detaro on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @12:16PM
(#29487463)
Integration of user-generated content in ubisoft games will always have a centralized component, sure. They wouldn't dare having that unrestricted.
Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by hannasanarion on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @12:27PM
(#29487656)
So now you are maintaining an expensive and complex distributed database that duplicates the work that's already being done by a cheap and manageable internal database. For what benefit?
Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by sokoloff on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @12:38PM
(#29487799)
So you can say you have an NFT to offer. (I wish I was kidding here.)
Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by Spivak on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @12:51PM
(#29487980)
And so they don't actually have to administer the marketplace. From their perspective it's just create a new skin and some NFTs for it, and release them into the wild.
Re:Ubisoft’s first NFT plans make no sense
by WorldMaker on Wednesday December 08, 2021 @02:01PM
(#29488867)
Administering the marketplace is that part that actually makes money, though, because the house always gets a cut of the transactions (in service fees and transaction fees). That's been a lot of Valve's success in all the easy profit from the Steam Marketplace. If this is to increase shareholder value in Ubi long term, NFTs are ass backwards because they aren't long term revenue generating, but a marketplace they owned actually would be.