Re:Ask HN: Why doesn't YouTube have a competitor?
by bkovacev on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @12:22PM
(#29475372)
Not to downplay the tech, but you could replicate majority of the tech nowadays with proper engineering effort, proper timeline and a budget. YouTube competitor would need to beat them in the business side of things, which is extremely hard, however not unachievable. The company would need to have proper monetization, proper support with proper appeal system and to enable producers to create high quality content without the fear of their accounts being banned. I believe this would be sufficient enough to start making a dent in the YouTube creator base.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Why doesn't YouTube have a competitor?
by NoPicklez on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @05:26PM
(#29479016)
"proper engineering effort, proper timeline and a budget"
Like all things? The proper engineering effort is hard to find in such a capacity and a budget to do all of this is overwhelming for most tech companies to attempt where an ROI can be seen within tolerable risk.
It's like saying we could live on mars if we had "proper engineering effort, timeline and budget".
Re:Ask HN: Why doesn't YouTube have a competitor?
by vineyardmike on Tuesday December 07, 2021 @03:50PM
(#29478043)
> to enable producers to create high quality content
Isn't this the MO of vimeo? Target higher quality content, and allow pay-per-hosting to avoid ads?