Re:Evidence for the “great resignation” is thin on the ground
by micromacrofoot on Monday December 06, 2021 @02:38PM
(#29464522)
Even if 2 went away overnight and zoning didn't exist... it would take probably a decade for supply to catch up to demand.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Evidence for the “great resignation” is thin on the ground
by dimitrios1 on Monday December 06, 2021 @02:57PM
(#29464770)
Even if 2 went away and zoning didn't exist, you would still have the banal, inane mountains of bureaucratic spaghetti that slow the process down every step it can, so some of that would have to go as well. AFAIK, one of the main reason California has such a large housing shortage isn't NIMBYs or zoning laws, there's plenty of space after all, but ass-backwards regulations, and stupid politics.
Builders want to build. Let's make it easier for them to do that.
Re:Evidence for the “great resignation” is thin on the ground
by RappingBoomer on Monday December 06, 2021 @03:38PM
(#29465346)
it's not just zoning that makes it hard to build--it's building codes and environmental regulations
Re:Evidence for the “great resignation” is thin on the ground
by BurningFrog on Monday December 06, 2021 @07:10PM
(#29467555)
Yeah, I think about half of the SF Bay Area is nature reserves.
Millions of people could live there.
Re:Evidence for the “great resignation” is thin on the ground
by micromacrofoot on Monday December 06, 2021 @07:07PM
(#29467537)
that’s BS, it’s almost entirely single-family zoning and NIMBYs