‘Codex’, to my knowledge, doesn't do such tricks and is a rather straightforward book of illustrations—the difficulty is only that its contents aren't readable at all and the illustrations are completely foreign to our world. Unless you know its language, there's just no way for you to get any of the writing.
The former kind of books are high- or mid-brow cultural exercises, whereas ‘Codex’ is a pure surrealist dream.
Opening the article, I was actually worried that the author would begin talking about the meaning of the book, but thankfully he went the same route as David Lynch: while telling some secrets of the production, he said nothing about the content.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/ZT_EA_Do...
And then there are things like Cyberpositive by 0(rphan)d(rift>)…
James Joyce did that with Finnegan’s Wake back in the ‘30s.
There's some pictures of the pages of this book in these reviews:
http://www.cornerfolds.com/2014/08/book-review-house-of-leav...
https://stingingfly.org/2016/11/01/house-leaves-mark-z-danie...
https://www.horrorbuzz.com/2015/09/13/house-of-leaves/#
http://www.thefeedbacksociety.com/television/house-of-leaves...