Re:Germany: New government plans 'right to encryption'
by thewakalix on Friday December 03, 2021 @09:55PM
(#29438257)
Aren’t infected people required to quarantine for a period of time? “Preventing both relatively larger and smaller harms, because they are both too large to tolerate,” doesn’t seem contradictory to me. And “not being vaccinated” is a pretty concrete property.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Germany: New government plans 'right to encryption'
by TheSpiceIsLife on Friday December 03, 2021 @10:02PM
(#29438288)
> Aren’t infected people required to quarantine for a period of time?
No?
Only some subset of those who are infected are required to isolate / quarantine.
Those who don’t get tested are free to meander.
Re:Germany: New government plans 'right to encryption'
by bostik on Saturday December 04, 2021 @02:45AM
(#29439426)
> Those who don’t get tested are free to meander.
And we should call them for what they are: mobile biohazards.
There are established protocols and procedures for dealing with such.
Re:Germany: New government plans 'right to encryption'
by TheSpiceIsLife on Saturday December 04, 2021 @10:31PM
(#29446480)
All humans are disease vectors.
I’m not convinced we, here in Australia anyway, have achieved a balance sufficient to satisfy my particular set of beliefs - as far as they go in this five minute period.
Re:Germany: New government plans 'right to encryption'
by account42 on Monday December 06, 2021 @03:14AM
(#29457411)
> Those who don’t get tested are free to meander.
Since worklplaces and public transport require at tests for the unvaccinated now, those walking around untested are mostly the vaccinated.