News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem by nineteen999 on Thursday December 02, 2021 @07:16AM (#29415178)
I actually agree with you - in many cases, I am sure they do.

But are they complete, and usuable enough in production? Did they ever acquire enough mindshare?

Did they get enough buy in?

The clear answer is no.

Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem by Chris2048 on Thursday December 02, 2021 @07:25AM (#29415238)
Mindshare and buy-in might be an issue of the ecosystem though. Not enough lisp/Haskell devs.
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem by nineteen999 on Thursday December 02, 2021 @07:34AM (#29415320)
Maybe thats because while those languages solve particular problem, they, or their proponents aren't solving the particular problems at hand.
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem by Chris2048 on Thursday December 02, 2021 @09:30AM (#29416535)
Perhaps, but that's speculation. If nor corp will invest outside fortran, cobol, C++ or java then there's a limit to how much problem solving a small community can do on its own dime.

The point is, I think speculative characterisations of <community>-dev members as lazy/unproductive is off mark.