News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem. Parent comment

Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem by bee_rider on Thursday December 02, 2021 @12:24AM (#29412835)
To be fair, it was unreasonable to expect Prolog coders to keep up with crypto advancements, I mean the language pre-dates SSL by decades.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem by tannhaeuser on Thursday December 02, 2021 @01:15AM (#29413087)
Care to expand on what Prolog coders have to do with OpenSSL? Not getting the context here.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem by wolf550e on Thursday December 02, 2021 @02:12AM (#29413389)
A joke about "developers whose main language starts with a "p"", meaning presumably perl, php and python. I guess in this context, ruby and JavaScript are also languages starting with "p".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem by Godel_unicode on Thursday December 02, 2021 @11:38AM (#29418458)
Don't worry, I told both of them what was going on ;)
[ Parent | on HN ]