Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem
by bee_rider on Thursday December 02, 2021 @12:24AM
(#29412835)
To be fair, it was unreasonable to expect Prolog coders to keep up with crypto advancements, I mean the language pre-dates SSL by decades.
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem
by tannhaeuser on Thursday December 02, 2021 @01:15AM
(#29413087)
Care to expand on what Prolog coders have to do with OpenSSL? Not getting the context here.
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem
by wolf550e on Thursday December 02, 2021 @02:12AM
(#29413389)
A joke about "developers whose main language starts with a "p"", meaning presumably perl, php and python. I guess in this context, ruby and JavaScript are also languages starting with "p".
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem
by Godel_unicode on Thursday December 02, 2021 @11:38AM
(#29418458)
Don't worry, I told both of them what was going on ;)
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem
by seanhunter on Thursday December 02, 2021 @02:38AM
(#29413513)
Pascal does predate the era of SSL by some margin to be fair.
Re:This shouldn't have happened: A vulnerability postmortem
by hn_go_brrrrr on Thursday December 02, 2021 @01:49AM
(#29413266)
Yeah, those Perl hackers are really out of touch :-)
Edit: to be clear, not maligning the "p" language developers, I was one myself. Simply saying there are a ton of technical people who are blissfully ignorant of the tiny pillars of clay that hold up the internet.