So again not a mandate. Good luck on your lawsuit, you'll need it.

edit: Since you called me dishonest, I'll explain exactly why I think you'll need luck on your lawsuit:

I understand you are highly charged about this issue due to your being involved in a lawsuit, so you seem to be in litigation attack mode. That's understandable. But calling the other side dishonest and not worthy of engagement won't serve you or your lawyer well in a court of law, so you might as well get used to being challenged without taking it personally.

Based on what you've posted here it seems like you feel the vaccine requirements are discriminatory and unfair because they restrict people from gaining access to essential services like air travel.

Yet the links you provide have shown that the Canadian government

1. Had an extended period of time when unvaccinated people could travel with a test to give them time to get vaccinated.

2. Have now moved to a phase where they don't accept tests but still have exceptions to vaccination

3. Those exceptions are specifically designed to accommodate people who rely on air travel for an essential service.

4. There are exceptions for people who cannot get vaccinated

5. There are exceptions for people in the process of getting vaccinated

6. There are options for you to travel if you cannot get vaccinated, making air travel not essential in that case, so your argument falls apart there.

I have no idea how this would hold up in court, obviously I'm not a lawyer. But the government is going to argue that they have the right to set public health policy (true), they have made accommodations (true), there are exceptions (true), and for anyone whom air travel is essential there are further accommodations (true). For the sake of your case, I hope your lawyer presents your arguments in court better than you have presented them here, because I'm not convinced.