Re:Firefox is the alternative to a Chrome hegemony
by ohgodplsno on Monday November 29, 2021 @08:52AM
(#29379853)
This list of standards also shows how Google attempts to make it even more impossible for anyone but them to maintain a browser. Shape detection API ? Seriously ? Picture-in-picture as a standard when it should be up to the OS/browser ? having the <input type="image"/> perform resizing and compression ?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Firefox is the alternative to a Chrome hegemony
by kwertyoowiyop on Monday November 29, 2021 @09:13AM
(#29380059)
They’re copying the old Microsoft playbook. Add so many APIs - the more complex the better - that nobody will be able to copy them all.
Re:Firefox is the alternative to a Chrome hegemony
by pseudalopex on Monday November 29, 2021 @02:15PM
(#29383924)
Joel Spolsky called it fire and motion.[1]
[1] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/01/06/fire-and-motion/
Re:Firefox is the alternative to a Chrome hegemony
by freediver on Monday November 29, 2021 @09:52AM
(#29380495)
We can thank WebKit and Apple's policy around it on iOS for suppressing and holding back these attempts, as sites on average still _need_ to work on an iPhone.
Re:Firefox is the alternative to a Chrome hegemony
by Spivak on Monday November 29, 2021 @11:00AM
(#29381349)
Shape detection is to have predictable QR code scanning across web apps, PiP as a browser API is necessary to enable it cross-platform. And image transformations are to try and collapse 100 js libraries of varying quality into a feature that people clearly want.
I’m a huge proponent of platforms aiming to be stable and largely not messing with shit but it has to be feature complete first.