I'm not saying that restricting travel is necessarily the right approach (though it probably is), but nothing in your comment really strikes me as compelling evidence that it's the wrong approach.
> Taking a risk-averse approach in a highly risky and uncertain situation isn't inconsistent with the WHO's recommendation to take a "risk-based and scientific approach."
South Africa interpreted the WHO's statements as being against imposing travel bans. The first sentence of your comment implies you agree that that's what they meant. It's either that, or the WHO's statements are meaningless verbiage.
This looks like the events of early 2020 repeating.
[0] https://www.foxnews.com/media/who-china-taiwan-interview
I linked fox because it was the first link to pop up but the same news was picked by several other national and international outlets across the political spectrum.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/30/senior-who-adv...
https://nationalpost.com/news/world/who-taiwan-bruce-aylward
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8172031/WHO-officia...