Re:Piracy release group EVO ‘blames’ movie industry for its ...
by aneutron on Friday November 26, 2021 @11:27AM
(#29351583)
From what I gather Google Chromecast w/ Google TV is a good performer in this regard. However, the issue remains that you'd have to pay almost 10€ per platform, for a total of 3 platforms, per month. That's simply not economivally viable.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Piracy release group EVO ‘blames’ movie industry for its ...
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Friday November 26, 2021 @11:41AM
(#29351727)
That's a heck of a lot less expensive than cable even without the premium channels.
Re:Piracy release group EVO ‘blames’ movie industry for its ...
by chollida1 on Friday November 26, 2021 @11:34AM
(#29351658)
Well another alternative is you pay say $5 per movie you watch or $2 per tv show episode rather than an all in price.
Would that be an improvement?
Re:Piracy release group EVO ‘blames’ movie industry for its ...
by ThunderSizzle on Friday November 26, 2021 @11:54AM
(#29351843)
Considering I can get AAA games for $10 after waiting a year or so, I'm not sure if $5 for a decade old movie really that worth it.
A-la-carte needs to be substantially cheaper to realistically compete with buffet style streaming services.
Re:Piracy release group EVO ‘blames’ movie industry for its ...
by dekoruotas on Friday November 26, 2021 @11:56AM
(#29351877)
I can't be the only one who just bought a 4K blu-ray player. The cost of a disc is cheaper than a monthly subscription and I can still trade them in making it a cracking good deal.
And quality is soo much better than streaming, literally made me move my sofa a little closer to TV!