News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The sticky issue of consent in street photography by em-bee on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @01:28PM (#29333358)
i do take issue with security cameras filming me. it bothers me, because yes, maybe the images get wiped unseen, but maybe not. how secure are those cameras? who gets access to the feed?

on the other hand, if a photographer takes a photo of me, i don't care as long as the photo doesn't get published.

i take photos myself, and in general my attitude is that publishing one of my photos requires the permission of all subjects in it. when i put photos on my own website then i explicitly add a license that allows a subject in the photo to use it for their own purposes as they see fit.

so as a photographer i explicitly give control back to the subjects in the photo, because that is how i believe this should be handled.

Re:The sticky issue of consent in street photography by detcader on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @01:41PM (#29333519)
"Racy Photos Were Often Shared at N.S.A., Snowden Says" - New York Times (July 20, 2014)

In 2021, to take a photo with a smartphone is to publish it, worldwide and forever.

(Of course I still take plenty of pictures of myself and friends. It's just not a clear line anymore what we get to control when social media and corporate/government leaks are everywhere)

Re:The sticky issue of consent in street photography by stevesearer on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @02:14PM (#29333922)
When entering stores with security cameras, I wonder how many use facial recognition tools and then how that information is being used / aggregated / sold.

It would be good to know whether facial recognition is being used before entering a business.