I wish systemd logged information about the source of “transactions”

Re:I wish systemd logged information about the source of “tr... by usr1106 on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @03:58AM (#29328143)

> Clearly, the two does not connect well … for systemd

It's linked from the man page. https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/systemd.1.html

Unfortunately the reading will still need to do ourselves. Not trying to be snarky here, it happens to me all the time that I have not read something and complain it's hard to understand.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I wish systemd logged information about the source of “tr... by bosie on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @05:01AM (#29328480)

I think what OP means is that having good documentation should not require you to read a blog of any sorts, even if it is linked in the man page. Either documentation is good OR you read the blog, you cannot have both.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I wish systemd logged information about the source of “tr... by jcelerier on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @05:19AM (#29328566)

I disagree, for instance in a man page I don't want to read the rationale for something (which the blog provides), just the raw "if you do this, then that will happen".

That would have its place in a GNU info book instead.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I wish systemd logged information about the source of “tr... by zozbot234 on Wednesday November 24, 2021 @06:32AM (#29328950)

Plenty of man pages have a dedicated RATIONALE section. You don't have to read it, but the stuff is documented.

[ Parent | on HN ]