News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by ascar on Saturday November 20, 2021 @06:19PM (#29292687)
> Kind of like how when you get vaccinated you provide value to your community by reducing the chance that you’ll become a disease vector. So getting the vaccine improves the health of everyone around you. If we didn’t subsidize vaccines, fewer people would get them, and we’d all be worse off.

This was a story told to us in the beginning of widespread vaccination, but is disproven since we have evidence that vaccinated people can carry and spread the virus. The story changed to we are less likely to spread it, but there is also evidence for similar amounts of virus in vaccinated people, so I take it with a grain of salt given the history. (multiple reputable sources readily available on Google)

It's important to know and spread this information as it means that even though vaccinated people protect themselves from harsh symptoms they still have to be careful not to spread the virus.

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by n8henrie on Saturday November 20, 2021 @07:32PM (#29293071)
This is only half the story. Compared to the unvaccinated, how likely are vaccinated individuals to have detectable virus in the first place?
Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by ascar on Sunday November 21, 2021 @05:41AM (#29295360)
That might very well be true and as a vaccinated person myself I hope it is true.

But how does that affect my conclusion that the vaccinated still have to be careful and herd immunity is unlikely to be a thing? A false sense of security is a problem in itself.

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by n8henrie on Sunday November 21, 2021 @11:26AM (#29297419)
You seem to be making a few assumptions. The other half of the story could easily be that vaccinated individuals are equally likely to harbor detectable virus, I'm just pointing out that there is a big other factor to consider before we know how important vaccination is with regards to herd immunity and benefit (or risk) to one's community.
Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by CodeShmode on Saturday November 20, 2021 @06:36PM (#29292792)
> similar amounts of virus in vaccinated people

Yeah right, gonna have to see a reference for that. Is it 'some vaccinated people have been found with equivalent amounts of virus' or 'on average they have the same amount of virus'. Because they're vastly different scenarios.

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by mandmandam on Saturday November 20, 2021 @06:50PM (#29292883)
? This is quite wide-spread and old news, and trivial to look up yourself before getting snarky.

> For people infected with the Delta variant, similar amounts of viral genetic material have been found among both unvaccinated and fully vaccinated people.

- https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/delta-var...

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by n4r9 on Saturday November 20, 2021 @07:26PM (#29293040)
Being vaccinated reduces the chance of getting infected in the first place. This is true even for the delta variant (although much more so for earlier variants)

https://els-jbs-prod-cdn.jbs.elsevierhealth.com/pb-assets/La...

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by mandmandam on Sunday November 21, 2021 @03:41AM (#29294999)
That doesn't take away from the truth of what I said - in fact it's covered at length in the very same link I posted. Sigh
Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by n4r9 on Wednesday December 01, 2021 @02:39PM (#29408187)
Your link contained a speculation about the length of time for which vaccinated people are infectious. Mine is a study demonstrating that the chance of transmission to contacts is reduced.

Surely probability of transmission is the key factor determining whether vaccination reduces the spread of the disease?

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by elvatoloco55 on Saturday November 20, 2021 @06:46PM (#29292857)
Its well documented that unvaccinated or vaccinated spread the virus in similar percentages. Go look in google scholar, why do you want to be spoon fed
Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by dsr_ on Saturday November 20, 2021 @07:49PM (#29293163)
It's not for their benefit, it's for yours.

Do you want to be known as the sort of person who claims "it's in the literature" but never provides cites?

Or do you want to be known as the sort of person who says "it's at this link"?

Unless you have gained name recognition, HN is a series of games in which you can decide to play or not in any given round, has limited but real downside (in terms of fake internet points), and not very limited upside.

So you can get away with being a defector on occasion, but it's much better to be a cooperator.

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by SubuSS on Sunday November 21, 2021 @10:02AM (#29296604)
The whole citing business has become more of googling your viewpoint and providing the top 10 links rather than actual research. It has been my long standing opinion that this is pretty much the same as replacing your doctor with webmd. Sadly experts can’t be replaced by YouTube education.

Anyway - my first google link - https://www.google.com/amp/s/theconversation.com/amp/no-vacc...

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by CodeShmode on Saturday November 20, 2021 @06:49PM (#29292871)
Some data for the opposite:

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/10/12/1044553...

"If you actually isolate virus from people who are getting a secondary infection after being vaccinated, that virus is less good at infecting cells,"

"all 37 case patients for whom data were available regarding the source of infection, the suspected source was an unvaccinated person."

Re:Is it stealing to read by the light of your neighbour’s l... by jimmygrapes on Saturday November 20, 2021 @07:52PM (#29293180)
I am skeptical of this association between the term "data" and the quoted qualifier "suspected".