CodeShmode

The point not to YOLO in vibe coded slop. It's that with agentic generation you can prove out concepts, features and technical approaches first because it's low cost. Once you have something working you can work on getting alignment.

And yes you should completely grok what you're finally committing, making sure it's fully tested. What it enables is lots of fast experimentation before settling on your final change.

https://www.google.com/search?q=software+spike

Or you can have a conversation with an agent to build up a requirements/plan spec, asking it to analyse existing code patterns. When it seems like the agent has a good understanding of what needs to be done and how. Ask it to implement, keeping changes as a local spike.

Ask the agent questions about all the other teams' code, reaching out to them for questions it can't answer or clarification. With agent capabilities atm this is rare or can be done fairly async: "please confirm these things".

Maybe realise your code architecture is completely wrong. Manually code up some new abstractions that fit better, write the learnings into the spec plan. Strip out any implementation that largely doesn't fit your updated abstractions. Ask the agent to migrate the code to the new structure.

Repeat until spike is operational and you're happy with the abstractions used

Chat with the agent to create a Design Doc for the approach in the spike. Create a single JIRA ticket for "Productionise CodeShmode's spike". Get reviews and feedback from stakeholders.

Integrate feedback into your spike, or even the original spec document and regenerate the whole thing.

So much of the ritual you've outlined here is overhead from working in a large org where roles are siloed. When one person is empowered to do more then the actual work per person goes down and the overhead becomes the dominant. But that overhead isn't needed anymore because one person can now do many people's work.

I've whipped up spikes in a few days that would've been a month of work across a team multiple DDs and approvals. In the past this wasn't feasible so we would need to justify what those people would work on. Now you can whip it up, show a working demo and ask "should we productionise this"

The tax dollars can go to programs that support normal folk, when the vast majority of tax collected will not come from normal folk.

Canva proper is freemium, yet they continuously add more free features

The issue being they don’t give everything away for free?

The timer would not need to be onboard the spinning flywheel, it could be on an observing quasite orbiting higher. When it's time to launch it could shine a control laser at the flywheel, which is used to time the triggering of a cutting laser at the right position to slice the payload off at the correct angle.

One timer could be used to launch multiple flywheel payloads over time

They're forced to execute their options, not sell their shares.

There would be a lot of evidence of what happened after though

> Their influence still can override the mining process that’s supposed to be the final word on transactions.

Any attempted tampering would be highly visible and why would anyone with control of that much ETH risk loss of trust in their valuable asset?

If someone wants to kill themselves and is physically able I very much doubt that going through the legal process would be the easy way out.

The web was the killer app built on the infrastructure of the internet. The blockchain ecosystem is still building it's infrastructure.

There are many ways to launder money.

I'm surprised Kleros is missing from this list

> regular people don't want to manage their keys

They don't have to, but they can if they want to.

How is that any better than telling git to ignore them? Esp when they're tightly coupled translations

He scales the kW/h hour down to five minutes to make kW/5min.

> Decades of constant failure from supposedly elite people in every possible field have lead to a reaction where people just don’t trust them no matter what they claim.

That’s a big claim to make without offering any examples.

I've heard someone say the pain from inserting an IUD was so great they backed out halfway through the procedure.

You just need to know that you took your own pill

I guess the argument would be that it has a greater impact on the profitability of intermittent energy sources as it can stabilize the grid by soaking up cheap off-peak power. Not sure if I buy it either.

Whether or not they pay a carbon price for burning the gas, it's still better for it to be productive in the process.

"For every other species"

The amount of gas to too small to be economical to transport away from the well.

> but not oppose enough to use force? I think that's just as useless as people saying they're sending "thoughts and prayers".

All the weapons, sanctions and money are good as "thoughts and prayers"? Isn't the Ukraine military running primarily on donated Javelin and stringer missiles atm?

"Things were awful for me and they should be awful for you too"?

Some data for the opposite:

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/10/12/1044553...

"If you actually isolate virus from people who are getting a secondary infection after being vaccinated, that virus is less good at infecting cells,"

"all 37 case patients for whom data were available regarding the source of infection, the suspected source was an unvaccinated person."

> similar amounts of virus in vaccinated people

Yeah right, gonna have to see a reference for that. Is it 'some vaccinated people have been found with equivalent amounts of virus' or 'on average they have the same amount of virus'. Because they're vastly different scenarios.

There are so many half truths in your arguments it would take far too long to refute them all. It’s hard to believe you’re not acting in bad faith, either that or completely indulging your confirmation biases.

There were plenty of media outlets that doubted the WMD story. There’s no widespread collision between media and government.

I'm not sure the points you've raised demonstrate that there are many New York teachers that should be fired that have not been. The link from the74million.com focuses more on teachers that were successfully let go.

New York city is also one of the most expensive states to live in so any financial comparison would need to be relative to cost of living.

Which is besides the point that perhaps teachers should be remunerated well.