however i wasnt referring to you specifically as arguing in bad faith but that seems to be the attitude of some very vocal people here. i included the full excerpt in case the point is relevant. i am not an expert in this field
does the issue in Erata 734 apply to 6200?
Well there are two reasons. The first is Errata 734, and the second is that the fix for Errata 734 requires loading different microcode than what was baked into the processor at manufacturing time ("6300 series CPUs have buggy microcode built-in, and libreboot recommends avoiding the updates"). I didn't mention Errata 734, because I'm focused on the second reason.
Working back from their reasoning, Errata 734 seemingly does not apply to the 6200 series.
i take no issue about with critically discussing someones logic. fud and attacks are annoying and dont contribute to a healthy discussion