News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spy camera detection using smartphone time-of-flight sensors by fortran77 on Thursday November 18, 2021 @11:28PM (#29273834)
The key is they're _retroreflective_.

From this paper:

> Specifically, the hiddencamera embedded in the object reflects the incoming laser pulses at a higher intensity than its surroundings due to an effect called lens-sensor retro-reflection. This occurs when almost all light energy impacting an object is reflected directly back to the source (see Section 2.2). These unexpectedly high-intensity reflections from hidden cameras cause certain regions of the ToF sensor to be “saturated” and appear as black pixels. LAPD processes these saturated areas to automatically identify the hidden camera and its location and displays it on the user’s smartphone screen.

Re:Spy camera detection using smartphone time-of-flight sensors by sturgl on Friday November 19, 2021 @09:20AM (#29277396)
Nevertheless, if you block all the ~850nm IR light from reaching the lens, then there cannot be any retro reflection at this wavelength, meaning the ToF cannot see anything.
Re:Spy camera detection using smartphone time-of-flight sensors by frizensami on Friday November 19, 2021 @09:28AM (#29277491)
Yes, I agree. I believe military-grade optics detection systems use multiple wavelengths, and some even use short bursts of visible light, making it harder to block.
Re:Spy camera detection using smartphone time-of-flight sensors by mnw21cam on Friday November 19, 2021 @04:57AM (#29275527)
The filter/sensor itself doesn't need to be retroreflective. The fact that it's sitting at the focus of a lens makes it retroreflective.