News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter rolls back AMP support, no longer sends users to ... by nightpool on Thursday November 18, 2021 @04:34PM (#29270896)
> Thing is...we don't need AMP to get those features.

I addressed this in another comment thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29269423), but I disagree. The fundamental problem is one of incentives—individual companies don't have the leverage to fight back against ad companies and advertisers that want to implement bad user experiences and slow loading JS. Google's adoption of AMP forces publishers and ad networks fall into line, by enforcing limits on floating ads, popover, interstitials, custom JS, etc. Is this self-interested on Google's part? Maybe. But it's hard to argue that it's not ultimately better for the consumer.

Re:Twitter rolls back AMP support, no longer sends users to ... by dbbk on Friday November 19, 2021 @02:31PM (#29281247)
Core Web Vitals achieves this anyway. Which is why Google is switching to using those signals instead of AMP in its search ranking.